We have two cars with what I consider pretty advanced technology in them. I’m going through an updating process with one of them that I think may cause some problems with many owners.
This update is a user responsibility supported by online help using real people. But it requires that the user download a program which will generate a set of data which is automatically written to a USB drive or an SD chip. Then the USB or or SD chip is inserted into the car’s console and the system is updated using a 5-step sequence while the car’s engine is running. I think quite a few folks will find the process challenging.
Our 2022 Volvo EV has a similar system with similar capabilities, but the updates have all been automatically downloaded and just require a user acknowledgement before the updates self-install. It’s pretty seamless.
And on a recent family member’s birthday, while driving to a celebratory dinner, on a whim, I asked the car to sing “Happy Birthday to (child’s name,)” which, to my surprise, it did! … even using the child’s name in the song lyrics.
Technology is great…but its constantly evolving. There is a reason that you are no longer using a Palm Pilot and that your Laser Discs are worthless. It is a little surprising that Hyundai chose 2G in 2017…
I don’t know much about cellular protocols. But it looks like they used 2G up until 2016 on some models and 3G until as late as 2018 models.
Here’s what Hyundai said about it:
" On January 1, 2023, Aeris Communications, the wireless service provider enabling the use of the Hyundai Bluelink devices in certain 2012-2016 vehicles, will discontinue 2G network service."
"2G Sunset (Will no Longer be Active): All 2012-2014 Bluelink equipped vehicles, 2015 Bluelink equipped vehicles (except Sonata with Navigation and Hyundai Genesis), and 2016 Bluelink equipped Santa Fe, Equus, Elantra, Elantra GT, Veloster (Non-Navigation), and Sonata Hybrid vehicles.
3G Sunset (Will no Longer be Active): 2015 Sonata, Azera; 2016 Azera, Santa Fe Sport, Elantra GT, Sonata, Sonata Hybrid, Sonata PHEV, Tucson, Veloster; 2017 IONIQ Electric, Veloster, Sonata PHEV, Santa Fe, Elantra GT, Elantra, Azera, Santa Fe Sport and 2018 Sonata, Santa Fe Sport, Santa Fe, IONIQ PHEV, Elantra GT."
I have a Forester with the Push Button start.
The “Pocket Fob” has a slide in key.
When the Battery died, the key was too hard for me to turn… thought it was broken.
Googled the problem… some angel posted that it was very difficult to grip and turn… I used a pair of pliers… it worked but I was home.
Don’t always have pliers with me.
Other than that, I like it along with Blind side Monitoring (Big deal for geezers) etc.
Starting to look for a new vehicle, as I have said before, me and technology are not friends. Seems all new vehicles are trying to one up the competition on adding technology. Not impressed. I view every bit of added tech as something else that can go wrong and I probably can’t fix. As a side note, I just sold one of my older trucks for about 25% more than I paid for it 9 years ago.
We have an Outback going on 9 years old that still has features and controls that are unused or mystifying to us. It runs like new, a battery replacement at around 5 years, and regular oil and filter changes. It’s only been back to the dealer once and that was a no-charge recall to replace the passenger-side airbag mechanism.
At 436,000 miles you have pumped approx. 32,750 gals of diesel fuel into your truck. At an average of $5/gal you paid a total of $163,787. The truck new cost less than the fuel it used.
That’s going to be the case for most any vehicle that someone keeps for a long time, especially with the high gas prices the last couple of years. But think about how much they have saved in vehicle payments and depreciation by keeping the same vehicle.
Technology is one reason why car prices have gone up and up. Yes the stuff can be nice, but a lot of people can’t afford basic transportation to get to work.
Worse is the cost of repairs. No longer can the shade tree mechanic tune up a rough running or disabled car — it requires computer analytics and repairs often require a new computer board (usually in the $800-1000 range) with no secondary market competition.
Oh, and each board controls several things, so if one part malfunctions, you got to buy the whole thing.
For the wealthy, tech can be great — for the struggling, it keeps them out of the game.
You may be overlooking the fact that technology plays an important role as the great equalizer in human societies. While your observations about affordability of the latest technological innovations by lower-income Americans are accurate, your argument does not give due credit to the overall importance of technology for the good it brings to all members of our society.
Technology is an amplifier of human work. That work may be manual or it may be cognitive but technology is the great equalizer. The first automobiles were beyond the budget of most people when they were first introduced, but most people today use them as an integral part of their daily lives.
Your objections appear to relate more to the pain of change than your perceived disadvantages of new technology. If you want to see the effects brought about by technology, and lack of it, just look at the countries in Africa.
Change is never comfortable, it’s often painful, but for our success it’s inevitable and it’s absolutely necessary.
I once saw a casino’s Keno machine with the BSOD (Blue Screen Of Death). It used a version of Windows. I wonder what the BSOD looks like in a vehicle? Perhaps the windshield turns blue?
Want to get an update done without you having to do it? Just tell the guy from Car Warranty that you will ‘renew’ your warranty with him if he can update your softare first
(By the way, those calls should have drastically been reduced of late as the FTC caught them).
Electronic systems are inherently more maintenance-free than their electro-mechanical counterparts. That is especially true of generations after the first couple. Remember all the problems with mechanical distributors, ignition coils, points, etc…? Much of that stuff has all been replaced with solid-state components. Gas carburetors with manual chokes have been replaced with computer-controlled fuel injection either direct or TBI.
And life with those systems is easier, cleaner and cheaper. But more importantly the modern automobile is significantly safer as well. Antilock brakes, traction control, stability control, automatic emergency braking, autonomous speed control and lane monitoring have already saved many lives.
Don’t disagree with any of the above. Difference is when the old mechanical systems had a problem, you could often get it running with a screwdriver and pair of pliers. When the new electronic systems have a problem, you usually need a least a voltmeter and code reader. I keep a code reader in the dash. Just because you may determine the problem, doesn’t mean you can fix it with basic tools.
My argument is that it’s the same challenge as fixing a buggy harness vs a carburetor. The challenge is coping with change. This time around it’s tweeking a potentiometer or dip switch vs adjusting a mechanical carburetor.
When my treadmill had a problem I called the manufacturer’s help line and they directed me to their website where I downloaded a fix and applied it to the treadmill’s console. Tools required were a cell phone, a phillips screwdriver a PC, Intenet connection and a blank thumb drive and viola!.. problem solved.
The problem is caused by change… and only one thing never changes. That one thing that never changes is the rule that says everything (else) changes.