Has Clark ever looked into the politics of why we are limited in what we can contribute to our retirement accounts?
God forbid if the ‘rest of us’ ended up wealthy at an older age. I read there are tax reasons, concerns that some will take advantage – no that wealthy people would ever do that, gosh no – I’d love to hear others perspectives on this. It’s something I have always found very troubling, and these limits are most definitely not congruent with inflation, etc.
There are limits because the government doesn’t want you shielding an excessive amount of income from taxation. The government needs money to operate. 401K contributions delay tax collection for decades or longer. The limits are raised periodically.
I forgot about the backdoor. I can’t do it because I have commingled funds in my IRA. That’s what my CPA tells me anyway. I’m guessing the backdoor could be in danger of going away by 2026.
Nah…you just need a Roth and shares of technology stocks that explode in value. Regardless of the wealth envy, you aren’t limited in how much your Roth can appreciate over time.
Are you saying he exceeded the annual maximum contribution and was allowed to do so?
Even if we assume this (without evidence) it has nothing to do with the Backdoor Roth procedure. No reason to demonize those that use the BDR allowed by law.
Peter Thiel was a co-founder of Paypal…and you are complaining about his ability to get IPO shares!!! Is that the secret connection?? He has provided venture capital to lot of different companies. Not all of them have been successful. Your hatred of wealthy people is clouding your judgment.
Risking capital and getting rewarded is the premise of our economic system. I think there is even a word for it…let me think…oh yeah, its capitalism.
Providing a way for working people to save hard-earned money for retirement years and letting it grow tax-free until needed is the premise of the Roth IRA program.
It wasn’t designed to provide a way for multi-billionaires to game the system to harvest tax-free billions.
In two years Theil will be 59 yrs old and be able to pull well over $5B from his Roth and you, me and all of the rest of the taxpayers will have to pick up the slack in resulting lost tax revenue. I think those are the taxes that you complain are too high already.
He wasn’t a multi-billionaire when he made that investment, and “game the system” is a disingenuous characterization of using the system exactly as the law allows. It was designed for people to harvest tax-free money. You apparently don’t like that he used it effectively.
There is no lost tax revenue. The taxes were paid on the contributions before going into the account. Whether the account is now worth $5, $500, $500k or $5B does not matter. I know many people with 7-figure Roth IRA accounts, which are substantially more than they contributed. Is that lost tax revenue also?? Of course not…
I think you are having trouble understanding how the Roth IRA works, like you did with the flat tax system. If you stop obsessing about other people’s wealth…I think you will lead a happier life.
When someone realizes a gain of $3B and pays zero taxes on that gain you think there is no lost revenue to the IRS? And in the next breath you suggest that a family living below the poverty line should pay the same tax rate as Peter Theil?
Interesting world view! Reminds me of a character in the leading role of a classic Christmas story…
Every single person that has a Roth IRA / Roth 401k is not paying taxes on dividends or realized and unrealized capital gains that occur within the account. This is really basic financial information…not sure why you are having trouble with it.
Don’t mean to go off on a tangent but what do you think of the deductibility of HSA accounts and participants being able to use the gains tax-free for qualified medical expenses?