# 40% in S Fund and 40% C Fund

**URL:** <https://community.clark.com/t/40-in-s-fund-and-40-c-fund/3750>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [November 1, 2023, 3:54pm UTC](https://community.clark.com/t/40-in-s-fund-and-40-c-fund/3750 "2023-11-01T15:54:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smartpolitics](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/65b543/32.png) [@Smartpolitics](https://community.clark.com/u/Smartpolitics)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2023, 3:54pm UTC](https://community.clark.com/t/40-in-s-fund-and-40-c-fund/3750/1 "2023-11-01T15:54:31Z")

</div>

Want an aggressive portfolio of 95/5 to become 65/35 20 years from now with a good mix of large cap, small cap, and international. Don’t like the lifecycle mix

When I look up the Total Stock Market Index, it is 87.5-90.0% SPY and about 10-12.5% VXF so I have 3-4x that concentration over the last 11 years with the TSP

I noticed over the last 15 years, the C fund has outperformed the S fund. I’ve invested 5% and they matched 5% and am currently investing 11.75% and they’re matching 5% so 16.75% or $1,050/month is being invested

At 40, I currently have $96,250 with 40% C, 40% S, and 20% I - no G or F funds. The L funds suggest 50% in the C, 15% in the S, and 35% in the I

Due to my dilemma, a coworker thought it might make sense to have half in my strategy and half in a lifecycle strategy so I don’t regret either decision

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smartpolitics](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/65b543/32.png) [@Smartpolitics](https://community.clark.com/u/Smartpolitics)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2023, 3:16am UTC](https://community.clark.com/t/40-in-s-fund-and-40-c-fund/3750/3 "2023-11-02T03:16:32Z")

</div>

Thanks. I do like the 45/27.5/27.5 along with a 38/38/19 with 5% in the G&F funds

I am at my highest international holdings at 20%

Yes I’d like to be in 65-70% stocks in 2047 but also have a nice 1-2 year emergency fund

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![p1g1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/cab0a1/32.png) [@p1g1](https://community.clark.com/u/p1g1)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2023, 9:39pm UTC](https://community.clark.com/t/40-in-s-fund-and-40-c-fund/3750/4 "2023-11-02T21:39:37Z")

</div>

1. 16.75% savings rate-the most important factor that determines retirement income is an individual’s savings rate. Congratulations on your impressive savings rate.
2. 95% equity in your 40’s- make sure you are comfortable with possible significant future declines in your equity. The S&P 500 declined close to 50% during a 6 month period in 2008.
3. 20% in international-for reference Vanguard recommends at least 20% in international.
4. Learning more about investing to help your current and future decisions is time well spent. An excellent concise book is “If You Can” by William Bernstein.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![billinin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@billinin](https://community.clark.com/u/billinin)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2023, 2:28am UTC](https://community.clark.com/t/40-in-s-fund-and-40-c-fund/3750/5 "2023-11-09T02:28:54Z")

</div>

> [@p1g1](#):
>
> 20% in international-for reference Vanguard recommends at least 20% in international.

Which I have never understood. It just seems like the patented CFP cya answer.

“Well I had them diversified”

Anyone care to explain? When domestic markets sneeze it seems like internationals get a cold.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![p1g1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/cab0a1/32.png) [@p1g1](https://community.clark.com/u/p1g1)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2023, 6:31pm UTC](https://community.clark.com/t/40-in-s-fund-and-40-c-fund/3750/6 "2023-11-09T18:31:51Z")

</div>

> [@billinin](#):
>
> When domestic markets sneeze it seems like internationals get a cold.

Your statement is correct to a degree. And you are in good company; Jack Bogle famously did not advocate adding international equity. However, while the correlation between U.S. and international equity performance has recently increased, the correlation is not 100%. Adding international funds thus tends to decrease the volatility of a portfolio. The folks who set up the target date funds at Fidelity, Schwab and Vanguard include international funds. Vanguard has a paper that goes over the details of the benefit of including international equity in a portfoli that is titled “Global equity investing: The benefits of diversification and sizing your allocation”
